Response to Statement by Mayor Marcello Serio 
Before responding to Mayor's letter I wanted to read it and reread it several times not because of the complexity of prose as for its content, which in some ways it seemed unlikely. Despite this interpretive exercise my opinion has not changed. Dr. Really wanted to reply to my article did not say it without reading it, but at least without having done so with due care. He uses half his text to explain the difference between major and minor systems to one megawatt of power subject to a different regulatory regime. Lesson useless since it was yours truly had clearly shown as probable but not certain means of circumventing the more stringent rules governing their large plants. He then goes on to list policy implemented by his team found in two places. The drafting of a municipal regulation strictly, the specification as if it were a merit, had not signed any agreement concerning solar and wind installations. If he had better read what I wrote would be easily noticed that my criticism was directed exclusively to the lack of political initiative and administrative activities of the plant or plants that are springing up in Via San Pancrazio, and not for the other achievements for which indeed revealed a difference of treatment and taxation in the method and procedures. And it is not generally
say "I assure you that our administration is implementing all the initiatives possible, at all relevant bodies to verify the legitimacy of what is happening " But what are the regulatory bodies? Do I get the first of them is just the City of San Give us in the serious and the boss? Why then I wonder beyond general insurance not come to a decision or advice was promoted by the majority to protect our best landscape? But not enough. The mayor falls into a second and more obvious contradiction when he says:
"Of course, being DIA for which the municipality of San Grant us, by its own leadership, has already signed an agreement, you too will agree that this is a matter for which it is necessary caution. " This is to the plant via San Pancrazio. A few lines later, referring instead to the central Italgreen says
" Aside from the photovoltaic Italgrin for which the town had already signed an agreement (this administration has only changed the content). So if I understand the former can not do anything because the procedure has been signed by a municipal officer, for the second it was possible to intervene and change along the way despite the Convention also this has been signed by a manager. I leave to readers the final decision. I would only add one more gloss. Italgreen The company under the Convention will have to pay to our town several hundred thousand Euros which I assume will be used for the good of the community, but the company or companies via San Pancrazio occupying the same land more or less what we pay? I'll tell you almost nothing. Finally, the mayor concluded his work in manuscript indulges in praise of transparency and consistency of its actions both political and administrative inviting me to compare it with my evidently in his opinion does not possess the same characteristics. Meanwhile I would like you to explain what administrative transparency and coherence as a work in adversity there is the collection tank of purified water that illegally and unlawfully repeat the City discharged into drainage canals and at the same time deal with an obvious distraction eco monster like what you see will definitely realized on the way that leads us to the sea. How then, and I start at the end, policy coherence may I say just one thing of absolute importance to me. I have always acted in full harmony with my principles and my ideas at times with the satisfaction of seeing them recognized after many years of history and the statements of some people carat national politicians (just read what he says today and what I stated I Fini a year ago on the PDL). So consistency is not easy, for which I paid a high price but I do not care. A coherence maintained for free and never was the latter consideration is not supported under any circumstances, as is often found by little help of any kind.
said the Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein:
"You could fix a price for his thoughts. Some are expensive, others less so. And what you pay your thoughts? I believe with courage." Nicola De Silla
